首页> 外文OA文献 >Are rights-based approaches helping (re)politicise development NGOs? Exploring the Spanish case
【2h】

Are rights-based approaches helping (re)politicise development NGOs? Exploring the Spanish case

机译:基于权利的方法是否有助于(非)政治化发展的非政府组织?探索西班牙案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Over the last decades, the rise of managerialism has contributed to the depoliticisation of practices and discourses of Non-Governmental Development Organisations (NGDOs). From some quarters, the adoption of rights-based approaches (RBAs) has been seen as an opportunity to challenge this process. From this standpoint, this article aims to explore to what extent RBAs may have helped (re)politicise the discourses of NGDOs. In order to do so, we look at how eleven Spanish NGDOs that have adopted an RBA are reshaping their understandings of issues related with power, participation and accountability. The analysis reveals that the adoption of RBAs seems to be a process full of diversity, tensions and contradictions, both across and inside organisations. Whilst in some cases RBAs may have consolidated managerialism, the opposite is also true. We hypothesise that external requirements from donors, as well as the different backgrounds, profiles, organisational cultures and previous political stances of the organisations, may be shaping how they conceive RBAs and, consequently, how they adopt them.
机译:在过去的几十年中,管理主义的兴起推动了非政府发展组织(NGDOs)的做法和话语的非政治化。从某些方面来看,采用基于权利的方法被视为挑战这一过程的机会。从这个角度出发,本文旨在探讨RBA可能在多大程度上帮助了NGDO的论述政治化。为了做到这一点,我们研究了采用RBA的11个西班牙NGDO如何重塑了他们对与权力,参与和责任制有关的问题的理解。分析表明,采用RBA似乎是一个在组织内部和内部都充满多样性,张力和矛盾的过程。在某些情况下,澳洲联储可能拥有统一的管理主义,但事实恰恰相反。我们假设捐助者的外部要求以及组织的不同背景,概况,组织文化和组织先前的政治立场,可能正在影响着他们如何构想RBA,因此,它们是如何采用它们的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号